УВАГА! Нова платформа наукового журналу «SCIENTIA FRUCTUOSA».
Перейти за посиланням -  http://journals.knute.edu.ua/scientia-fructuosa/

INNOVATION AS A FACTOR OF CREATING THE VALUE OF THEENTERPRISE

Автор: Sveta on .

Cite as APA style citation 
Dziura M., Jaki A., Rojek T. Innovation as a factor of creating the value of the enterprise. Scientia Fructuosa. 2022. № 2. S. 48-60. https://doi.org/10.31617/1.2022(142)04

FREE FULL TEXT (PDF)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31617/1.2022(142)04

UDC 005.591.6:658.15
JEL Classification: D41, F41, O31
 
DZIURA Marek,
PhD, Assistant Professor
Cracow University of Economics, Poland
Rakowicka, 27,Kraków, 31-510,Poland
Ця електронна адреса захищена від спам-ботів. вам потрібно увімкнути JavaScript, щоб побачити її.
ORCID: 0000-0002-4889-2883
 
JAKI Andrzej,
PhD, DSc, Professor
Cracow University of Economics
Rakowicka, 27,Kraków, 31-510,Poland
jakia@uek.krakow.pl
ORCID: 0000-0002-4799-4343
 
ROJEK Tomasz,
PhD, Assistant Professor
Cracow University of Economics
Rakowicka, 27,Kraków, 31-510,Poland
rojekt@uek.krakow.pl
ORCID: 0000-0002-2977-4312

INNOVATION AS A FACTOR OF CREATING THE VALUE OF THEENTERPRISE

Introduction. The phenomenon of globali­zation of competition causes an increasing inte­rest of the staff managing the value of the company. The increase in the value of the company is the overriding goal of all those inte­rested in the development of the company. It con­nects both investors, employees, suppliers and customers.
Problem. One of them is proper innovation management. Hence the importance of innovative activity undertaken by enterprises, manifesting in undertaking various innovations and shaping the innovative climate in the enterprise.
The aim of the article is to show the impact of determinants on the shaping of innovation pro­cesses and the growth of the company’s value.
Methods. General scientific methods such as the systematic approach, theoretical generaliza­tion and comparison, analysis and synthesis were used in the research.
Results. Innovation should be an integral part of the company’s performance. Openness, crea­tivity, realistic thinking are becoming apart of modern economic realities and the most impor­tant value of every company that determines its competitiveness. Changes occurring in the sur­roun­dings of the organization force enterprises are constantly adapting. Enterprises that can create and implement innovations can overtake these unexpected events, thus being able to prepare them accordingly. Changes take place every­where, and innovations allow you to adapt to them.
Conclusions. Proper value management means that the company should concentrate on developing their main areas of activity in which has or may gain a competitive advantage in the market. The source of creation enterprise value is the value that a company can create for their clients including innovations, which at the same time is very common source of competitive ad­van­tage. Such a viewpoint focused on values for the client, not the product that the company has developed, is a breakthrough ineffectiveness of innovation management and the condition for the success of innovation strategies enterprises in building their value.
Keywords: innovative climate, the value of the enterprise, innovation management.

REFERENCES

  1. Cockburn, I., & Griliches, Z. (1988). Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market’s valuation of R&D and patents. American Economic Review, 78,419-423 [in English].
  2. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Eco­nomic Literature, 28 (4), 1661-1707 [in English].
  3. Harabi, N. (1995). Appropriability of technical innovations: an empirical analysis. Research Policy,24, 981-992 [in English].
  4. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation. Research Policy, 15, 285-306 [in English].
  5. Winter, S. G. (2006). The logic of appropriability: from Schumpeter to Arrow to Teece. Research Policy, 35 (8), 1100-1106 [in English].
  6. Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashion: the diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16, 586-612 [in English].
  7. Liebeskind, J. P. (1996). Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17,(Special Issue), (pp. 93-108) [in English].
  8. Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3 [in English].
  9. Shapiro, C. (2001). Navigating the patent thicket: cross license, patent pools and stan­dard-setting. In: Jaffe, A., Lerner, J., Stern, S. (Eds.), Innovation Policy and the Eco­nomy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, (pp. 119-150) [in English].
  10. Somaya, D. (2003). Strategic determinants of decisions not to settle patent litigation. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 17-38 [in English].
  11. Teece, D. J. (1980). Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise, Journal of Eco­nomic Behavior & Organization, 1 (3), 223-247 [in English].
  12. Johannessen, J-A., &Olsen, B. (2010). The future of value creation and innovations: Aspects of a theory of value creation and innovation in a global knowledge economy. International Journal of Information Management, 30, 502-511 [in English].
  13. Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rents. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1), 33-46 [in English].
  14. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Mana­gement, 17 (1), 99-120 [in English].
  15. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In: Lamb, B. (Ed.). Competitive Strategic Management. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. [in English].
  16. Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management 11, 1-15 [in English].
  17. Christensen, C. M. (2001). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA [in English].
  18. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99, 569-596 [in English].
  19. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learningand innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1128-1152 [in English].
  20. Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 1120–1171 [in English].
  21. Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32 (1), 273-292 [in English].
  22. Wanga, H., & Chen, W-R. (2010). Is firm-specific innovation associated with greater value appropriation? The roles of environmental dynamisms and technological diversity. Research Policy, 39, 141-154 [in English].
  23. Freeman, J. H., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). Niche width and the dynamics of organiza­tional populations. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 1116-1145 [in English].
  24. Ghemawat, P., & Del-Sol, P. (1998). Commitment versus flexibility? California Mana­gement Review, 40 (4), 26–42 [in English].
  25. Markowitz, H. M. (1959). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Wiley. New York [in English].
  26. Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47, 117-132 [in English].
  27. Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2001). Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 30 (7), 1019-1039 [in English].
  28. Godfrey, P. C., & Hill, C. W. L. (1995). The problem of unobservables in strategic mana­gement research. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 519-533 [in English].
  29. Rouse, M. J., & Daellenbach, U. (1999). Rethinking research methods for the resource-basedtheory: Isolating sources of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Manage­ment Journal, 20 (5), 487-494 [in English].
  30. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. HarvardUniversity Press, Cambridge, MA [in English].
  31. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston [in English].
  32. Helfat, C. E. (1994). Firm specificity in corporate applied research-and-development. Organization Science, 5 (2), 173-184 [in English].
  33. Picot, A., Freudenberg, H., & Gassner, W. (1999). Management Von Reorganisationen, Gabler, Wiesbaden [in English].
  34. Hall, B. H. (2000). Innovation and market value. In: Ray, B., Mason, G., O’Mahoney, M. (Eds.). Productivity. Innovation and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [in English].
  35. Gibbert, M., Leibold, M., & Probst, G. (2002). Five styles of customer knowledge mana­gement, and how smart companies use them to create value. European Management Journal, 20(5), 459-469 [in English].
  36. Hamel, G. (2006). The why, what, and how of management innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84(February (2), 72-84 [in English].
  37. Hamel, G., & Breen, B. (2007). The future of management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press [in English].
  38. Hargrave, T. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 864-888 [in English].
  39. Johannessen, J. A., Olsen, B., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2000). Innovation as newness: What is new, how new, and new to whom? European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(1), 20-31 [in English].
  40. Jacobides, M. G., Knudsen, T., & Augier, M. (2006). Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. Research Policy, 35,1200-1221 [in English].
  41. Prahalad, C. K., & Krishnan M. S. (2008). The New Age of Innovation: Driving Cocreated Value Through Global Networks, University of MichiganRoss School of Business [in English].
  42. Dobiegała-Korona B. (2014).Innovation in building the value of the company (Inno­wacje w budowie wartości przedsiębiorstwa), ZS WSH Zarządzanie, Warszawa [in English].
  43. Doyle, P. (2000). Value-based marketing, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [in English].
  44. Dobiegała-Korona, B., &Doliński, T.(2006). Contemporary sources of the enterprise value (Współczesne źródławarto ściprzed się biorstwa), Difin, Warszawa [in English].
  45. Neale, M. R., & Corkindale, D. R. (1998). Co-developing products: Involving custo­mersearlier and more deeply. Long Range Planning, 31(3), 418-425 [in English].
  46. Ottosson, S. (2004). Dealing with innovation push and market need. Technovation, 24(4), 279-285 [in English].
  47. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). The Future of Competition: Co-creating Unique Value with Customers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press [in English].
  48. Priem, R. L. (2007). A consumer perspective on value creation. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 219-235 [in English].
  49. Rayport, J. F., & Jaworski, B. J. (2005). Best face forward: Why companies must improvetheir service interfaces with customers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press [in English].
  50. Thurow, L. (1999). Building wealth: The new rules for individuals, companies, and nations in a knowledge-based economy. New York: Harper Business [in English].